File TXT tidak ditemukan.
Are We Living In the MATRIX? This Scientist Might Have An Answer ONCE and For ALL | Donald Hoffman
JCQrnNa7xBQ • 2022-02-24
Transcript preview
Open
Kind: captions Language: en honestly man trying to wrap my head around your take on consciousness and we're living in a constructed reality that we're essentially in the matrix whether we want to be or not evolution gave us this headset and it's no surprise i see the moon i render a moon i turn away i don't render a moon so the moon doesn't exist your life in my life right now is we're in a simulator a space-time simulator this may also be an answer to a very very question about um alien intelligences what where are they well we're looking at our headset of course we can't see them [Music] when we look up and see the moon it's because there really is a moon and it would exist even if there were no observers to see the moon it would still exist and we don't believe that we see all of reality no one thinks that we see everything that there is to see but we do believe that we've been shaped by natural selection to see those aspects of the truth that we need to see to stay alive and so that our perceptions of space and time are giving us a genuine insight into a real space and time that would be there even if there were no observers to perceive it and also our perception of objects like tables and chairs the moon quarks and leptons and so forth that these things would also exist and have roughly the properties that we see even if there were no creatures no observers to see them at all and the red pill that i'm offering is to say that if you believe evolution by natural selection then the mathematics of natural selection makes it very very clear that the probability of zero that any of the language that we use in our perceptions the language of space and time the language of shapes and objects and position and momentum and colors and so forth is the wrong language to describe objective reality whatever that reality might be it's not that we're getting the shape of this table a little bit wrong or the color's a little bit off it's that no description in the language of space and time and objects and colors could ever be be true reality whatever it is can't be described in that language if we buy evolution by natural selection so we have a choice between taking one of our best confirmed scientific theories seriously namely evolution by natural selection or taking our intuitions that space time is fundamental and objects are fundamental taking that intuition seriously and i decided to side with this science on this one uh umvelt is your senses taken the world in a certain way and uh we have different senses in a bat so a bat can do echolocation we cannot and therefore the way that a bat interprets the world is very different than the way that we interpret the world and every sort of species has a different umvelt you can even have humans that have a diff a slightly different umvelt one that's colorblind there's a million other examples but you you get these variations that are massive between species um you get like a dog the the amount that they can smell is crazy they can smell a seizure coming which is absolutely bananas whereas of course you're not going to get a human that does that because of the number of um scent receptors in the nasal canal and so cool all right that that's an umvelt every creature you know homo sapiens has one room one user interface we have the apple interface and someone else you know some other creatures have the mac or the pc interface or or whatever yep and and and there's gonna be a wide variety of interfaces that evolution evolves every species has its own class of interfaces and in each case the interface never shows any species the truth at all according to evolution but there are selection the selection pressures that erase information about the structure of the world in perception do not also apply to math and logic the reason is that we do have to have some elementary ability to reasonable fitness payoffs two bytes of an apple give me roughly twice the fitness payoffs of one so not reasoning about objective reality just reasoning about fitness payoffs and the logic of fitness payoffs right so that's why there's no selection pressures necessarily to be geniuses of math and logic but at least the selection pressures are not uniformly against any capacity in math and logic whereas in the case of perception it's one can show the unit the pressures are uniformly against any access to the structure of the world um in terms of the structure of what we perceive in in our senses so that's why we have to be very very careful so certain for example christian philosophers alvin plantinga for example has argued from not mathematically but informally from evolution saying that it would make all of our cognitive capacities unreliable and therefore evolution by itself was unreliable theory and therefore we should not you know not believe it and i'm not saying anything like that at all i'm saying that the theory of evolution has a core that john maynard smith found the evolutionary game theory when we look at that core we find that there are certain peripheral assumptions like dna exists whether or not it's perceived space and time exist those peripheral assumptions turn out to contradict the mathematical core of the theory and one can prove that but math and logic our ability with math and logic does not contradict the evolutionary you know the core of evolutionary theory so this we have to be very very careful that's why when you do this you know it's not just hand wave anymore you really have to look at the replicator equation you really have to look at the fitness payoff functions and do combinatorial analyses and so forth this is very very careful work but that's what we do with our best scientific theories we take them very very seriously we look at their equations and say okay if the equation entails the probability zero that we see reality as it is then we've got a choice we can agree that we don't see reality as it is or we can say we need to revise the theory now we don't have an alternative to evolution by natural selection so if someone wants to propose one they've got a lot of work to do because evolution of natural selection is an incredibly successful theory for anybody who's spent time in vr what i'm saying will be obvious right if you're playing a vr game of like race cars you see a red corvette when you turn your heads up that way you know that you're only seeing a corvette that you're creating when you turn your head that way you turn your head to the other side now you're seeing a blue mustang the red corvette is gone it doesn't exist there's no red corvette in the computer that's running the game the red corvette is only in your mind when you look over there now you're seeing a blue mustang because you're making that and so you you're rendering these things and then destroying them there is a reality but it's not corvettes and it's not mustangs it's the super computer that's running the game and that's what i'm all i'm saying is evolution gave us this headset and it's no surprise i see the moon i render a moon i turn away i don't render a moon so the moon doesn't exist there is something but it's just not like it's not the moon it's nothing like the moon just like there's something there's a super computer in the the vr analogy but in the super computer if you look you'll never find any you know green mustangs or red corvettes you give an example in your book that is so powerful if you would take a second you describe what's happening in your eye when you look at a scene that includes a red apple and the way you describe it at the photoreceptor level i was like oh my god it gave me such an understanding of how terrifyingly complicated all right things actually do you remember the part that i'm talking about right so this is now just normal physiology and so for the moment i'll be talking as though you know i believe in brain science and everything is within the framework of a theory so i'm now using neurophysiology and physics right now for this to describe this so when you look at a red apple and suppose there really is a red apple just for sake of this argument it's got a real shape and light rays hit it and they have certain frequencies and they pass through the lens of your eye which focuses it on the back of your eye just like a camera would and on the back of your eye you've got a piece of brain called the retina it's a nervous tissue so a piece of nervous tissue it has 120 million photoreceptors it's like a 120 mega megapixel camera and each photoreceptor is just reporting how many quanta of light how many photons it catches so i caught three i caught 10 i caught 50 that's all you got a bunch of numbers so you have 120 million numbers there are no colors there are no shapes there are no motions there's just 120 million colors numbers not not even colors it's like if you look at the the digital output from a video camera you'll just see a stream of numbers if you look at stream of numbers you'll see the problem that vision has you can't tell from the stream of numbers what's going on you have to create three-dimensional objects and shapes and colors and so forth from all those numbers and so that's the problem that we have envisioned you have all these photon counts 120 million photon counts on each eye and from that you have to then create objects see that it's a boy on a bicycle eating a hot dog you know all of that is you and that comes that's not just theory it becomes really an important problem when you're trying to build computer vision systems right you're trying to build a self-driving car say with with passive vision systems well so the vision systems are cameras the video cameras say they're taking in video maybe they have you know a few million pixels that they come in that each each you know maybe 70 times a second or something like that well those pixels are just numbers you've got millions and millions of numbers coming in every second there's nothing in there that says that's a boy that's a car don't you know that's a stop sign there's nothing in there that says that you have to you have to have megabytes of software that's really intelligent that takes all those numbers and starts computing with them to figure out three-dimensional shapes to figure out what the objects are to and to figure out oh i'm about to hit a boy i need to hit the brakes and so forth so so this is not just abstract self-driving cars have to solve the problem of starting with numbers that are in unintelligent in some so just a bunch of numbers and giving you an intelligent assay of what's happening in the world and so that's why a third of the brain literally a third of the cerebral cortex the higher part of our brain is involved just in visual perception when you add the other senses it's it's more like half the brain is involved in sensory perception because the senses are doing an incredibly complicated job but from my point of view what they're doing is they're building a vr world and it takes a lot of processing power you need super computers you know what would have been considered super computers to do vr in real time and that's what we're doing we open our eyes and it looks like we're just seeing a 3d world with objects and shapes and colors it seems so real and so just we're seeing the truth but because you have billions of neurons trillions of synapses that are doing it all within about 100 milliseconds and so you're so fast at it that you just think you're opening your eyes and seeing the truth you're seeing a vr world that you're projecting out there in real time hey guys hope you enjoyed the episode brought to you by our sponsors at blue blocks go to blue blocks dot com forward slash impact theory for 15 off your order or just use discount code impact theory at checkout all right enjoy the episode when you think about what's really going on as a computer programmer is trying to make this game called grand theft auto you're dealing with algorithms and mathematics and moving electrical currents around a xbox or whatever what you're saying is what you see when you walk around the room and interact with stuff and you think about space time and einstein and relativity is as divorced from reality as the computer programmer is from the gamer who plays his game that's that's exactly right and and so one way to think about it is science for all of its incredible breakthroughs and wonderful theories has only been studying our headset science has not yet been studying objective reality outside of our space-time virtual reality that from an evolutionary point of view was just evolved as a way for us to play the game of life and stay alive long enough to reproduce not to show us the truth so we have really in the in the last four or five centuries really gotten to be wizards of our headset wizards of the grand theft auto game but just because you're a wizard of grand theft auto does not mean that you know anything about the circuits and software that are running the game and for someone who thinks that they know everything when all they know is grand theft auto means they they're still stuck in the headset science i want to claim has the tools we have learned the right tools as we've studied our headset we are ready to use those same tools to venture outside the headset outside of space and time so science has the right tools we just have to open up you know open our minds to the fact that we're just playing a game inside space time it's just a virtual reality your life in my life right now is we're in a simulator a space time simulator and we've been given like an ai system we've been given certain intrinsic desires that we then find and so so so my wife is an artist that's how she's exploring i i am still stuck at third grade stick figures so that's not how i'm exploring i'm exploring in a different way so so so there's billions of humans and there are billions of different ways that we explore in music in art and literature in science various kinds of science meditation sober it's sports there are all sorts of ways that consciousness is exploring um through through us and there is not like one is the best or that makes consciousness want to go to all the assay to create this vr experience to run each of us as sort of an individual experience in consciousness the idea would be that that is what consciousness is about is the exploration of all of its possibilities so is that just the miracle like i've now hit the part where you're like i don't [ __ ] know this is the miracle well yeah and when we when we say that um that's something that we have to say is true of any explanation right any explanation at some point we say if you grant me these assumptions then with those assumptions i can explain everything else well so and i totally buy into that here here is the basic assumption i've always made about the miracle that the whole point is to say hey everybody i've got this theory here's my miracle check it out theory works right yeah yeah wow this is better than everything okay the only reason i've told you about this thing is so you can tell me how to move the miracle back even farther or are you just like cool i'm good with that miracle and now i just want to explore within that where that miracle is or well so i want to do both so so this this miracle is so new that i you know i need to explore a little bit right so i want to push on this one but but the miracles i'm proposing are consciousness is fundamental so experiences themselves don't come from physics they are fundamental so that's a miracle and second um this other miracle that that girdle approved where he proved it but it's still a miracle right the the incompleteness of mathematics that you can that there's endless exploration that's just a fact which is a remarkable fact we proved it but it's nevertheless this why should the universe be that way why should logic demand that that's so that's but it's a satisfying kind of end point where we say that's the way the world is here's the theorem that says that's the way the universe is and that that one theorem tells us why if you're up to exploration then have fun because you will always there's no getting there that's the key there's no arriving all right my friends let's talk about blue blocks blue blocker glasses have been a game changer in my life if you're someone like me who is sensitive to artificial lighting and extra sensitive to artificial blue light from a cell phone or a computer screen then you need to try blue blocker lenses they are going to improve your sleep blue blocks is all about science quality and style their products are made under optics laboratory conditions in australia and come in prescription non-prescription and readers blueblox is offering a special discount exclusive for impact theory listeners go to blueblocks.com forward slash impact theory for 15 off your order or use discount code impact theory at checkout once again that's blue blocks which is b l u b l o x dot com forward slash impact theory for 15 off your order or use the discount code impact theory at checkout all right my friends give these a shot i use them all the time take care and be legendary suppose you go to a vr arcade with some friends to play virtual volleyball and you put on your headset and body suit and you're on a you know a like a beach volleyball scene palm trees and sand and then that and you're playing vr volleyball for a while then one of your friends you know says i'm thirsty i need a drink he takes off his headset and bodysuit to go to go get a drink his avatar sits lifeless on the sand it collapses on the sand it looks within the vr headset within the game as though he's dead but he's his consciousness is not ceased he's merely stepped out of that interface all right now we're in what i'll call the phineas gage problem okay so once so phineas gage for those that don't know is railroad worker one of the most famous examples in neuroscience he's hitting a tamping rod it's like a three foot rod thicker than your thumb and it shoots up through his jaw and out the top of his head taking if i remember right a teacup's worth of brain matter which seems impossible but never loses consciousness but they say he's forever different right different and he used to be like super sweet and he was one of the best workers and then he becomes this belligerent [ __ ] and he can't hold a job right so i will say that's that is the so using this notion of the headset or the umvelt it's like once you alter the way that his brain works and i'm fully willing to accept that this is a problem only inside of the headset but once you alter that function within the headset is fundamentally different our free choices are not part of our conscious experiences you can't directly experience your own free choices you can experience that you chose but you can never actually experience yourself choosing this well it's really quite interesting you can experience like if i go uh you know here's there's chocolate and vanilla i'm going to choose between chocolate and vanilla well i just chose chocolate but how did i do that well i had some deliberation process but when i finally it i can all i can do is see myself reaching for the chocolate or the vanilla i can see my cogitation processes but but the but isn't that all in the headset all that i'm seeing is in the headset that's right so i'm seeing so by the way i only know my actions through my headset i actually don't know what i'm doing when i reach out and grab something i don't know what i'm doing in objective reality in the realm of conscious agents how does all of this play out in your real life and i've heard you talk about that there are moments where you have i'm sort of putting words in your mouth but almost a meditative experience where you transcend the notion of self um how so how do you stay so enthusiastic about this for so long when it seems like i mean really really at a deep [ __ ] level man as a human experience this just all feels so real right right well i wouldn't say that i transcend the self but i what i do get it once in a while is a glimpse that oh this is just a headset i actually feel it that i'm just rendering this most of us feel like space just exists i'm stuck inside space there's this big stage i'm on the stage it's very different i think by the way the next generation will probably get this much easier those who have just been raised spending a lot of time in vrs that are as compelling and as immersive as everyday life it's going to be just sort of obvious you take your headset off and go it's a no-brainer to think well this is just a headset too and to just sort of be there so i think that it'll it'll be for the next generation the fact that i'm having a hard time about it thinking about it this way and imagining it experientially will just be sort of an artifact of the technology i grew up with if i grew up with vr's that were really good as opposed to the stuff that we grew up with which is not that good then it would just be sort of obvious you do it when you're young enough it's just this obvious that yeah i'm just seeing a vr headset too because by the way here's one way to think about it if you close your eyes you just see sort of gray right model gray in front of you so it looks it doesn't look like nothing it looks like model gray but what is it like backwards back through your head when you close your eyes well it's not modeled gray it's nothing and it's really the first time you really if you close your eyes and experience that yeah what is it like in front of me yeah it's just gray sort of model gray what is it like behind me absolutely nothing that's the headset you only have a headset of space-time in front there is no headset behind now you have a not a visual headset then you have this set yeah i can put my hands back there and do stuff so so i have this but it's all a creation it's all and so i do get glimpses of that once in a while but there were no now put on the natural selection language right so i have to pick the language of the science that i want to use you know because i don't have a better language in some sense for discussing this evolution um there were no selection pressures for us to see the truth and so there were no selection pressures for us to not take space time as the truth and so we do piaget tells us you know when we begin to take objects as real as we you know these aren't just like little data structures that you create that they really exist all the time he called it object permanence and piaget said that you know when the kid is about 17 months 16 or 17 months of age they don't have object permanence permanence you take a little baby doll put in front of a child they play with it you put put it behind the pillow if they're 16 months old they just doesn't need it doesn't exist piaget said and then but at 18 months now they go and crawl around and try to get the object the baby doll out of the behind the pillow later experiments showed maybe down to three or four months but the point is these experiments show that we're programmed now i'm using the evolution language we're programmed by natural selection to buy into the illusion that objects exist even when they're not perceived object permanent when we're three or four months old we're not rational it's being done to us without our permission and so by the time we come to the age of reason it's it's the water that we we don't know that we're wet it's the water we've been swimming in all of our life we just have been programmed to take this as the reality this may also be an answer to a very very deep question about um alien intelligences what where are they well we're looking at our headset of course we can't see them that's interesting they're out there that's really interesting we may we may i'm not saying we won't find some of them out there our headset may give us access to certain alien intelligences on planets around alpha centauri and so forth but it's going to be trivial compared to all the consciousnesses that are out there that's what a headset is for it's there to hide all of the consciousnesses because it would be overwhelming to interact with them so that's where they are they're all around us we're like ants that don't see the guy with the raid can coming at them they can't they just can't see it right um so they're all around us but we're we are stuck on our headset and we think that we're the the epitome of of advancement and knowledge and and so forth might it would be funny and it may be the case that every that that's a rookie mistake that every consciousness goes through in a simulator that it thinks it because it's headset is only going to give it the best access to itself and others like it and less access to others and so in its own eyes it will always be the wisest in its in its environment and so it may be a rookie mistake that every simulator the consciousness creates has that we all have to go through this phase of going oh we're the best we're the greatest we're the epitome of evolution and then we slowly realize oh no no no no i'm in a simulator and there's you know there's this infinite range of other possibilities of consciousness some so profound that i that i if i could see them i won't be you know inclined to fall down and worship them who knows you know just so but but it's it's a really humbling position so we go from being the top of creation the the the smart yield the brain is the most incredibly complicated thing we've ever found in the entire universe that point of view to oh wow um we've made a rookie mistake here um there are consciousnesses out there that are far more you know mind-blowing than anything i could even concretely imagine so it's it's a very very different kind of thing but i think all of us do wonder about what's next and why are we here and what is it about that's why i mean that's one reason i do this is it life is very very short i want to explore and things that most of what i've believed very deeply has been very deeply wrong most of what humanity has believed very deeply has been very deeply wrong we have a very good we're almost about 100 percent consistent in being deeply wrong we've believed that space time is fundamental almost everybody believes that space time is fundamental we all believe the earth is flat now a few and very advanced physicists ed whitten has said space time is doomed david gross has said it's in doomed neymar connie ahmed is saying space time is doomed and these guys especially nema are now really being adventurous very very brave and saying let's go outside of space and time into a world where we can't think just imagine what they're trying to do we're trying to think entirely outside space and time like as you said as a kid you're going what could possibly be on the other side of space and time these guys are saying not only is there something on the side i need to think deeply about it and here's a mathematical structure in which space and time quantum mechanics and unitarianity don't even appear in the language and then i'll show you how our headset they don't call it headset that's not me ad living for them but so how space and time which i'm calling the headset how space and time and quantum mechanics and general relativity appear from these deeper structures in which there's no space in no time so that fits perfectly with what what i'm saying now they have no idea what this deeper structure is about and what i'm up to is i'm actually nema gave a class at harvard last fall more than 20 lectures on for graduate students on these deeper structures outside of space and time i am taking this class online there's all on youtube so i'm just studying it i'm transcribing these lectures studying them because i believe that i can show with my team my mathematicians so they'll show that the long-term behavior this dynamics of consciousness that we're working on what we call the asymptotic behavior will give rise to the structures he's seeing like his amplitude and so the reason why and then the amplitude he already shows how to build up space time from that that way i'll be able to go all the way from conscious agents through the long-term behavior conscious agents through the amplitude and to space-time i can show you how the headset is built that's my goal and so i'm i'm really quite excited once i get you know i know enough to be worth his time i may talk with him but but i'm not going to waste his time until i know enough so i'm trying to figure out how the headset is built once we if we succeed we'll be able to reverse engineer that headset and the technologies we'll we'll be able to play with the parameters of spacetime it's like suppose you're you know a wizard at grand theft auto and you can play within the game do all sorts of things that people find amazing that's great but imagine someone who actually knows the source code they can take the wizard and they can give them a flat tire they can take all the gas out of his tank they can make the road infinitely long they can do whatever they want to they can play with the very parameters so the wizard is nothing all of our science right now has made us wizards we're eventually going to get the source code of the game where can people get your book tell people about the book where you want them to connect with you oh yes it's called the case against reality um you can get it on amazon or apple and so forth the case against reality um and then i've got a twitter feed um at donald d hoffman i think but if you just google my name on twitter you can find it and i put links to most of my to to i'll put a link to our podcast here and and so forth but um and yeah so on twitter and you know i have a website at the university of california irvine that lists some of my papers and has my email um ddhoff uci.edu so people can email me i i you know i get enough that i can't respond to most of the emails but but every once in a while i can respond so nice you know what that's like i'm sure i i do indeed cool well guys check him out for sure hopefully you enjoyed this and if you loved it be sure to subscribe and until next time my friends be legendary take care
Resume
Categories