Impact Books: "Homo Deus" by Yuval Noah Harari
1V-OqXsCjYk • 2017-06-17
Transcript preview
Open
Kind: captions Language: en hey everybody welcome to another impact books book report this is long overdue in my opinion but it is also one of the books that I am absolutely um unsure of how I'm going to pull this together and do a book review this book is massive it is a book called homodeus by my boy yval Noah Harari he also wrote um Homo sapiens or just sapiens excuse me which was also a fascinating book I loved that um this is sort of picking up where that left off and asking the question and positing some answers of where are we going as uh the human species and he paints a very interesting I cannot tell you how intriguing I found this book but also found that he was maybe a little Bleak um in the end but this this book really is utterly fascinating I for anybody that's just curious um this is a book you will not regret reading so um I'm going to have to heavily rely on my notes on this one it was very very dense book and to avoid just sort of waffling around um I'm going to give it to you right from my notes so he makes a very structured logical argument he lays out who we are and that's really the first movement of the book is to understand humans um how our societies function how we work how our brains work um and it goes something like this um basically that the humans have two imperative drives they're always going to have that are always going to be pushing them forward one is um searching for true immortality and two is happiness and those are two things that are so innate to who we are as human beings that were never going to give up the search for either of those so even if they both lay truly outside the grasp of what human beings are capable of which many people think immortality is one of those things I obviously do not um but that they are so hardwired into us to want them that we're always going to chase them and there's huge business around it so we're always going to to want that now remember all of these arguments are going to seem a little bit random at first but they add up to some of his conclusions so it's important to go through um his next saying is on happiness that's very interesting take and he says that Evolution has programmed happiness to be fleeting and I've talked a lot about the difference between emonic happiness which is framework happiness it's becoming something it's using Techni or a skill in order to serve others and that fills you with this sense of well-being but one thing um that I never really get into is even UD demonic happiness is something that comes and goes now it may be more lasting than the momentary happiness of eating a bowl of ice cream but he makes a very compelling argument that every kind of happiness is ultimately fleeting and the example that he gives is he said imagine that you ate one meal and you had an eternal feeling of bliss and you never you know were bothered to go eat again and so you would eventually starve to death you wouldn't pass on your jeans or likewise imagine if you had one one orgasm and it left you with an eternal feeling of bliss uh you would never seek to have another orgasm which means that you wouldn't be spreading your genes and so this that's why every one of our base level human drivers is by its very nature fleeting and that was uh just a very succinct way of something that I've spent a lot of time thinking about and I found that really really interesting and that fleeting nature again is going to add up to where we're going as a species to understand these drivers for immortality for happiness that all of these pleasurable things all of these things that drive our behavior all of them are are designed to be fleeting to be ephemeral to be something that we we have to keep going back for um really inform sort of where he believes that we're headed all right emotions are biochemical algorithms the notion of algorithms are really important to him um and we'll get into um some of the the what he calls new religions and dataism being one of the new religions that really rides on algorithms so this notion of him explaining humans even as being algorithmically driven is pretty interesting um and he says that algorithms are one of the most fundamental building blocks of life period And if we're going to understand how human works we really do have to understand algorithms and emotions are essentially the most efficient way for the algorithms to communicate back with us and so um he talks about the subconscious being where we can process data in a way that is faster and vaster so the conscious mind is um as Jamie wheel explains it sort of the um the headline it's your subconscious is delivering up sort of after the fact is it's you know assessing its surroundings and all of that it's feeding up these headlines and that's what you experience in your conscious mind but really below the surface are all these algorithms vast algorithms that are running that are able to process and parse and assimilate an insane amount of data now it would be way too slow of a process for us to have a sort of rational understanding of what we're experiencing so what he saying is the algorithms speak to us in emotions so the emotions that we experience um are actually just algorithmically driven and it's the subconscious way of speaking to the conscious mind so that we will act very very rapidly and the example that he gives in the book is a baboon that's going after a bushel of bananas that are between it and a tiger and will it be able to get to the bushel of bananas and Escape faster than the tiger will be able to close distance and it has to process a lot of data how fast it is how fast the tiger is the distance it is from the bananas the distance the tiger is from the bananas um is the tiger does it seem hungry or does it seem disinterested all of those things are going to factor into this baboon's decision but it's not thinking about that all on a conscious level it sees the tiger sees the bananas and it has a gut feeling to either go for it or turn and run in the opposite direction and that feeling of unease or confidence is the algorithms that's them speaking up to you and emotions uh he does a really good job of explaining that and I found that utterly interesting and it made um all of my emotions that much more relevant when it makes it feel like it's this conversation that I'm having with my subconscious um processes and by the way that's something that's really useful in life is to when you get that feeling and this is something I've talked about before in terms of how do you become more introspective how do you become more self-aware is to realize like when you feel something weird in your gut something feels off there is an algorithm running and it is trying to tell you something something once you understand that none of those Sensations are random or halfhazard and they are very much the result of um your unique algorithms which have to do not only with your genetics but your upbringing and everything that's going on in your life that it is uh trying to tell you something and so whether or not you listen to that is going to be determined by what your goals are and so anyway we could go off and whole tangent on that we won't but that that's the way um that the subconscious is speaking to you all right uh whatever the dominant form of Mythology is in human society is really going to shape the very fabric of that society and as we started getting into this um I found this incredibly interesting and he said that when cultures um were more animist so we viewed ourselves as being sort of at one we were one piece of the cosmos we were one piece of the planet and so um we didn't necessarily view ourselves as any better than um other animals so if we were walking through the forest and we came across a snake or um a tiger whatever um animist societies may actually speak to that animal and say something like hey we're both here looking for food I won't mess with you if you don't mess with me and there's a real sense of connection but as we move out of an animist society and we go into a society whose dominant form of Mythology is theist then everything changes and in theist religions um you're living in a world where uh basically the plants and animals are um under human dominion and God has granted us uh special status as human beings and basically he says that this shift has massive implications in terms of how we treat animals in the environment which we can certainly see um and it's really the shift that has allowed us to slash and burn entire rainforests and do uh farming animal farming the way that we do now which really wouldn't be possible if we didn't have a dominant form of Mythology that gave us dominion over all of those things um so thought that was interesting and I was very curious sort of where he was going with this and building on it um but ultimately where he's going to take you is to the point of saying okay we have a new religion now and that new religion now is humanism and that has implications but does he think we're going to make the crossover into our sort of next generation of being a human um while we're still human uh humanists or do we transition what he calls dataism we'll get to that in a minute um I'll just read my direct note on this next point that he makes dear God this is fascinating uh the thing about mythology and religion that allows humans to cooperate in very large groups is that they have um they're able to believe that what their fellow humans are doing is uh a natural lot or a commandment from God now where this gets really interesting he goes into um the Crusades he goes into the Pharaohs in Egypt and how the mythology played into the way that everybody was treating each other and um he talks about the Crusades being sort of this fascinating moment where you had two exact um mirrored belief systems but they were opposing but because they were mirrored we were able to get into this huge clash between Christianity and Islam but it was only because you had two competing uh religions that both believed in a single God both believed that they were meant to fight and die for the holy land that they had to recapture that if either of them had believed even just a slight different variation other than my God is the one true God my God is the one true God and it's different than yours uh the Holy Land Is Mine The Holy Land Is Mine uh we have to kill the infidels we have to kill the infidels right so it literally it all lines up which is why there was the just catastrophic Collision that there was but if one of the groups had dominant mythology that said um you know like take one that's animist right that we're all a part of this and this land isn't anymore mine than it is yours when you came to take it over more likely than anything I would back off and I would find other pass to um deal with there would be no sense of like holy ownership and a need to fight for that land and I just like the way he looked at it through the lens and in fact this is one of the things that he says is imagine you look back at the Crusades you think oh my gosh that's so ridiculous or you look back at the way the pyramids were built using slave labor and you think oh my gosh that's so ridiculous and yet what are the beliefs that we believe now that 100 years or 200 years from now people will look at and say that's ridiculous idul so every society looks back and even you know 100 years ago or 200 years ago and it all seems patently ridiculous but we are living through one of those moments right now and thinking about our own period and all the beliefs that we have and we're about to get that um get into that with humanism because it made me realize I'm a humanist like and I had no idea that there was even a name for it um that ultimately almost most certainly future Generations are going to look back on it like it's just sort of obviously ridiculous um and then um he goes into defining that there are three types of reality one subjective two objective and three inner subjective um the one that's really interesting here is inner subjective and money is the best example so something that's an inner subjective truth is something that is only true because we all agree that it's true so money is really just paper or gez in today's modern era it's like uh zeros and ones in a computer somewhere um so that is only valuable as long as we all agree that it's valuable and if we all stopped agreeing that it was valuable it would immediately cease to be valuable so take Bitcoin right Bitcoin people started saying hey it's valuable it's worth something and because that because they were willing to trade it for goods and services then it actually became valuable um so that's really interesting and this the notion of remember these are all bricks that he's building to lead up to like what's that Next Movement so inter subjectivity becomes critically important as you begin to ask a question which he basically is positing that we're ultimately going to be taking over um the programming of the human being that will basically invade our own DNA that we will make modifications um that it will be um sort of he doesn't quite say this but basically the concept is it'll be as easily editable as um you know text on a computer now so we eventually get to the point where we can go in edit our DNA we're going to have to then make decisions about in what direction we edit it and and those decisions are going to be based entirely on the inner subjective things that we value even though they're not objectively valuable um we're going to shape the next generation of humanity in directions based on that inner subjective truth so what are inner subjective truths where will we put our emphasis what are we going to evolve ourselves into it's pretty crazy um he notes that we're the only animal that can imagine things that we have not seen so other animals in the animal kingdom use their forms of communication to describe the world as they see but humans are the only ones that can describe things like money companies governments all right and this is where it gets really interesting um in trying to really explain explain the driver shaping the human behavior of large groups of people um he says that um you can't just look at the neurons and firing patterns in the brain you have to understand uh the inner subjective reality that I was talking about of cultures and he said take North and South Korea for instance they aren't so different um from a genetic or environmental standpoint um and yet they have massive differences but their differences are because they have dramatically different inter subjective fictions and that they believe um they have very different inner subjective fictions that they believe in and adhere to uh the following is a direct quote from the book by the way I just thought this so interesting I took the time to write all of this down verbatim um maybe this is a quote maybe someday breakthroughs in neurobiology will enable us to explain communism and the Crusades in strictly biochemical terms yet we are very far from that point during the 21st century the border between history and biology is likely to blur not because we will discover biological explanations for historical events but rather because ideological fictions will rewrite DNA strands so the quote continues but I'm just going to interject here and say um that's what I was talking about that we're going to Value certain things we're going to begin to manipulate our DNA code um and make new humans in our own liking and the things that we believe should be good but like how tall should they be how smart should they be should they be empathetic should they be less empathetic like what does all that look like more emotional less emotional should they be like Spock and pure rationality like we're going to make those decisions and they are very much decisions based on inner subjective truth um which that this whole part like I just found insanely interesting political and economic interest will redesign the climate and the geography of M mountains and rivers will give way to cyberspace as human fictions are translated into genetic and electronic codes the inner subjective reality will swallow up the objective reality and biology will merge with history in the 21st century fiction might thereby become the most potent force on Earth surpassing even Wayward asteroids and natural selection hence if we want to understand our future cracking genomes and crunching numbers is hardly enough we must also decipher the fictions that give meaning to our world all right so when he talks about fiction there he's talking about those in subjective fictions that we're all telling ourselves the religions that we believe in the value systems that we have that we have created that don't necessarily have a foot and objective reality and so what we choose to Value as we begin to shape um DNA as we begin to I mean think about crisper cast 9 and our ability to go in and live literally edit our um genome I mean it's it's really fascinating to think where this is going to go um I take a very optimistic approach I think that we will um lean on the better angels of our nature and I think that good things will come out of this um he paints maybe a little more objectively balanced uh notion but I think he leans a little um to the gloomy side but nonetheless uh just incredibly interesting um and he's saying uh fiction isn't bad in fact this is a quote fiction isn't bad it's vital without commonly accepted stories about things like money States or corporations um no complex Human Society can function we can't play football unless everyone believes in the same madeup rules and we can't enjoy the benefits of the markets and courts without similar makeb believe stories but the stories are just tools they should not become our goals or our yard sticks when we forget that they are mere fiction we lose touch with reality end quote um this is where he gets into into the new religions so humanism is a new religion humanism sees Life as a process of gradual interchange leading from ignorance to Enlightenment by means of experiences the highest aim of the humanist life is to fully develop your knowledge through a large variety of intellectual emotional and physical experiences that's end quote um that's when I realized I'm a humanist uh through literally no intention and that was what I found so fascinating is that it really is like a part of a bigger movement and it's something that is present in society and that we're just moving that way now um you know when you look at the society sort of at a macro level like when that started happening and all that I have no idea but it was utterly fascinating to hear somebody I'd never met reflect back my belief system which felt so unique to me um to articulate it so well I thought that was really fascinating so um that made me really pause when this same guy said and let me tell you what religion is coming and uh we'll get to that in a second uh but this is a lead into that so this is a quote the main products of the 21st century will be bodies brains and minds and the gap between those who know how to engineer B's brains and those who do not will be far bigger than the gap between Dickens Britain and the M's Sudan indeed it will be bigger than the gap between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals now knowing him that's uh one of his sort of um almost warnings seeing as how Homo sapiens eradicated the Neanderthals um so I think there's something lurking in the margins on that one uh and then he says that dataism is really the only new quasi religion that is poised to take over from humanism and dataism basically states that everything that humans and machines do is um a data processing algorithm and that really according to data dataism it's all about how the data is processed the efficiency therein so according to dataism Communism for instance and capitalism aren't competing ideological systems instead they are both variations of data processing and capitalism which uses distributed processing and communism uses centralized data processing um capitalism has proven itself to be a much more efficient form of data processing uh anyone is able to join the system at least in theory and this is why um Comm communism fell because just to like get bred to people is brutally difficult when every decision is centralized so um he posits that capitalism won because it's just a more efficient way of processing the data the markets determine the prices not some governmental agency the markets determine um who makes how much of what not the governmental agencies so it's all done locally um and the yeah it's constantly fluctuating the markets are making decisions in real time um and he says capitalism has proven itself to be a much more efficient form of data processing um and that one of that's one of the reasons that capitalists prefer lower taxes because as you raise taxes the wealth pulls in one area the government and the decisions of things uh become more and more centralized with the government and that's why capitalism which wants to maintain this sort of fierce distributed um data processing would push back against that um okay one thing that he prognosticates is that as the data processing algorithms become more and more important and we all feed everything we do into the data system and he does he talks a lot about like you know what happens when um all of your emails are being read by AI that follows you it's Unique to you you have it for you know decades and it reads every email it listens to every phone conversation it listens to all the music that you listen to it watches everything that you buy uh the types of people that you date it's you know um reading your heart rate and subjective and objective measures of happiness and all of that so that to the point where instead of you going through Tinder and saying O I want to see this person it goes actually know remember that they were fun uh when you dated somebody just like that before they were fun for the first month and then you really began to burn out on them and then ultimately the breakup was brutal and you went into a period of depression for 6 months after that so I advise even though this guy looks a little more boring you should actually go out with him and that you had a relationship like that before and it actually brought you more happiness and you would actually uh you know for a year after uh lamented the breakup and so this is you know what we suggest based on all the like thousands of data points that AI would have and as he was describing it and I've done a significantly worse job as he was describing the book I thought I want that I want that AI in my life like I wanted to read my emails because I'm certainly not going to I want it to listen to my phone calls I want it to be you know reading the data being kicked off by my Fitbit and all that it sounded amazing and I knew he kind of meant it as a warning but it sounded phenomenal to me um he goes out of his way to note that we can't really predict the future uh but his final words are a little Bleak and he essentially says in the face of dataism humanism loses its importance humans become one more piece of data and we're only as important as the data we kick off and that that is um ultimately going to make us and this is almost a direct quote turn um disappear in a stream like a lump of dirt floating Downstream and um I thought wow I actually get what he's saying uh because you do if data isn't were to sort of swallow the world then AI would be way more important than humans because it can uh process so much more data than we can so much more rapidly uh it would kick off a lot more data so like H does one human life really matter that much from a data processing standpoint not really um so that was not the most uplifting of endings but he did he goes out of his way to say hey look these are just like guesses you never really know uh where this is all going to end up so regardless of a mildly Bleak like um sort of take on it I cannot stress enough this book will it is fascinating and it will make you look at yourself life culture where we're going all in an amazing new light I found this utterly fascinating this was one of those books I couldn't shut up about I was talking to everybody that walked by me about this this book uh it was yeah just amazing it gets my highest recommendation um and I really believe that you should read things that you disagree with I think that's important so if any of the ideas I said in here like you think oh man that doesn't really resonate with me man that might be more reason to read it all right guys if you haven't already be sure to subscribe uh this isn't a weekly show most of them are but when I read something that just seems really important to um cover we will cover and this one was awesome I loved it and I think you will too so subscribe and until next time my friends be legendary take care
Resume
Categories