Robert F. Kennedy Jr: CIA, Power, Corruption, War, Freedom, and Meaning | Lex Fridman Podcast #388
NPtBkw5uD-0 • 2023-07-06
Transcript preview
Open
Kind: captions Language: en it's not our business changed the Russian government and anybody who thinks it's a good idea to do regime change in Russia which has more nuclear weapons than we do um is I think irresponsible and you know Vladimir Putin himself has said you know we will not live in a world without Russia and it was clear when he said that that he was talking about himself and I and he has his hand on a button that could bring you know Armageddon to the entire planet so why are we messing with this it's not our job to change that regime and and we should be making Fair friends with the Russians we shouldn't be treating him as an anime now we've pushed them into the camp with China that's not a good thing for our country and by the way you know what we're doing now does not appear to be weakening Putin at all the following is a conversation with Robert F Kennedy Jr candidate for the president of the United States running as a Democrat Robert is an activist lawyer and author who has challenged some of the world's most powerful corporations seeking to hold them accountable for the harm they may cause I love science and engineering these two Pursuits are to me the most beautiful and Powerful in the history of human civilization science is our journey our fight for uncovering the laws of nature and leveraging them to understand the universe and to lessen the amount of suffering in the world some of the greatest human beings I've ever met including most of my good friends are scientists and Engineers again I love science but science cannot flourish without epistemic humility without debate both in the pages of academic journals and in the Public Square in good faith long-form conversations agree or disagree I believe Robert's voice should be part of the debate to call him a conspiracy theorist and arrogantly dismiss everything he says without addressing it diminishes The public's trust in the scientific process at the same time dogmatic skepticism of all scientific output on controversial topics like the pandemic is equally if not more dishonest and destructive I recommend that people read and listen to Robert F Kennedy Jr his arguments and his ideas but I also recommend as I say in this conversation that people read and listen to Vincent record yellow from this week in virology Dan Wilson from debunk the funk and the Twitter and books of Paul offit Eric tople and others who are outspoken in their disagreement with Robert it is disagreement not Conformity that bends the long Arc of humanity toward truth and wisdom in this process of this agreement everybody has a lesson to teach you but we must have the humility to hear it and to learn from it this is the Lex Friedman podcast to support it please check out our sponsors in the description and now dear friends here's Robert F Kennedy Jr it's the fourth of July Independence Day so simple question simple big question what do you love about this country the United States of America I would say well there are so many things that I love about the country on uh you know the Landscapes and the waterways and the people Etc but on the kind of a you know the higher level you know people argue about whether we're an exemplary Nation and the that term has been given a bad name particularly by the neocons the actions the neocons in in recent decades who have turned that uh that phrase into kind of a justification for forcing people to adopt American systems or values at the barrel of a gun but my father and Uncle used it in a very different way and they were very proud of it I grew up very proud of this country because we were the exemplary nation in in uh in the sense that we were an example of democracy all over the world when we uh when we first launched our democracy in we were the only democracy on Earth and by the Civil War by 1865 there were six democracies today there's probably 190. and all of them in one way or another are modeled on on the American experience and it's kind of extraordinary because or if our our first contact with uh our first serious and contact uh with the European culture and continent was in 1608 I want John went through came over with his Puritans and the Sloop Arbella and Winthrop gave this famous speech where he said this is going to be a city on a hill this is going to be an example for you know all the other nations in the world and he he warned his fellow Puritans they were you know sitting at the this great expanse of land he said we can't um be we can't uh uh be seduced by the the war of real estate or by the carnal opportunities of this land we have to take this country as a gift from God and then turn it into a uh an example for the rest of the world of of God's love of God's Will and uh and wisdom and the and then you know to 200 years later 250 years later they are a different generation they're mainly Dias or people who um had a a belief in God but not uh so much a love of particularly religious cosmologies you know the framers the Constitution um believe that we were creating something that would be replicated around the world and that it was an example it was in democracy there would be this kind of wisdom from the collective you know that and the word wisdom means the knowledge of God's will and that somehow God would speak through the collective in a way that um that he or she could not speak through you know through totalitarian regimes and um you know I think that that's something that even though uh Winthrop was a white man and a Protestant that every immigrant group who came after them I kind of adopted that belief and I know my family when you know our my family came up all of my grandparents came over in 1848 during the Potato Famine and they saw this country as unique in history as something that you know that was uh that was part of kind of a broader spiritual Mission and so I I'd say that from a thirty thousand foot level that uh you know that's I grew up so proud of this country and believing that it was the greatest country in the world and for those reasons well I immigrated to this country and one of the things that really embodies America to me is the ideal of Freedom Hunter Thompson said freedom is something that dies unless it's used what does freedom mean to you to me Freedom does not mean you know chaos and it does not mean Anarchy it means that it it it has to be accompanied by restraint if it's going to uh live up to its promise um in the self first right what it means the capacity for human beings to um to exercise and to fulfill their uh their creative Energies unrestrained as much as possible by government so this point the hunter estas has made is dies unless it's used I agree with that yeah I do agree with that and I think he'd he was not unique in saying that you know Thomas Jefferson said that the tree of Liberty has to be had to be watered with the blood of each generation and what he meant by that is that it's it's uh you can't live off we can't live off The Laurels of the American Revolution that you know we had a group we had a generation where between 25 000 and 70 000 Americans died they gave their lives they gave their livelihoods they gave their status they gave their property and they put it all on the line to give us our Bill of Rights and that but those Bill rights the moment that we signed them there were forces within our society um that began trying to chip away at them and that you know what happens in every generation and it is the obligation of every generation to safeguard and protect those freedoms the blood of each generation you mentioned your interests your admiration of Albert Camus of stoicism perhaps your interest in existentialism Camus said I believe in myth of Sisyphus the only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion what do you think he means by that I suppose the way that kamu view the world um and the way that the stoics did and a lot of the existentialists was that it was uh that it was so absurd and that the uh the the problems and the tasks that were given just to live a life are so insurmountable that the only way that we can kind of um get back the gods for giving us this you know this uh this uh impossible task of of living life was to embrace it and to enjoy it and to do our our best at it I mean to me I you know I read camo and then particularly in the myth of Sisyphus as a um as kind of as a parable that uh and it's the same lesson that I think he he writes about in the plague where we're all given these insurmountable tasks in our lives but um that uh by doing our duty by being of service to others we can bring meaning to a meaningless chaos and we can bring order to the universe and you know Sisyphus was uh was kind of the iconic hero of the stoics and he was a man because he did uh because he did something good he delivered a gift to humanity he angered the gods and they condemned him to put a rock up the hill every day and then it would roll down when he got to the top it would roll down and he'd spend the night going back down the hill to collect it and then rolling it back back up the hill again and the task was observed it was insurmountable he could never win but the last line of that book is one of the great lines which is uh which is something to the extent that you know I can picture Earth says smiling because Camus belief was that even though he um his task was insurmountable that he was a happy man and he was a happy man because he put his shoulder to the stone he took his duty he embraced the tasks and the you know and the absurdity of life and he pushed the stone up the hill and that if we do that and if you know we find ways of being service to others that is you know the ultimate that's the key to the lock that's the solution to the puzzle each individual person in that way can rebel against absurdity by discovering meaning to this whole messy thing and we can bring meaning not only to our own lives but we can bring meaning to the universe as well we can bring some kind of order to life um uh you know that those the Embrace of those tasks and the and the commitment to service resonates out from us to the rest of humanity in some in some way so you mentioned the plague by Camus there's a lot of different ways to read that book but one of them especially given How It Was Written is that the plague symbolizes uh Nazi Germany and the Hitler regime what do you learn about human nature from a figure like Adolf Hitler that he's able to uh Captivate the minds of millions rise to power and take on pull in the whole world into a global war I was born nine years after the end of World War II and I grew up in a generation that was big you know with my parents who were fixated on that um on you know what happened at my father at that time the you know the kind of the resolution in the minds of most Americans and I think people around the world is that there was there had been something wrong with the German people that you know the Germans had been particularly susceptible to this kind of a demagoguery and to following a powerful leader and um and his industrializing cruelty and and and uh and murder and my father always differed with that and my father said this is not a German problem this could happen to all of us we're all just inches away from barbarity and the thing that keeps us safe in this country are the institutions of our democracy our constitution is it's not our nature you know our nature has to um has to be restrained and it and that comes through self-restraint but it also you know the beauty of our country is that we develop we devise these institutions that are designed to allow us to flourish but at the same time on not to give us enough freedom to flourish but also create enough order to keep us from collapsing into barbarity so um you know one of the other things that my father talked about from when I was little you know he would ask us this question if you if you were the family and Anne Frank came to your door and asked you to hide her would you be one of the people who hit her at risked your own life or would you be one of the people who turned her in and of course we would all say of course we would hide Anne Frank and take the risk um but you know that's been something uh kind of a lesson a challenge that has been uh that has always been near the Forefront of my mind that if a totalitarian system ever occurs in the United States which my father thought was quite possible he he was conscious about how fragile democracy actually is um that would I be one of the ones who would resist the totalitarianism or would I be one of the people who went along with it would I be one of the people who was at the train station and you know Krakow or uh or um or you know even Berlin and saw people being shipped off to camps and just put my head down and pretend I didn't see it because talking about it would be destructive to my career maybe my freedom and even my life um so you know that has been a challenge that my father gave to me and all of my brothers and sisters and it's something that I I've never forgotten a lot of us would like to believe we would uh resist in that situation but the reality is most of us wouldn't and that's a good thing to think about that uh human nature is such that we're selfish even when there's an atrocity going on all around us and we also you know we have the capacity to deceive ourselves and all of us tend to kind of Judge ourselves by our intentions and our actions what have you learned about life from your father Robert F Kennedy first of all I'll say this about my uncle because you know I'm going to apply that question to my uncle and my father my uncle was asked when he first met Jackie Bouvier who later became Jackie Kennedy she was a reporter for a newspaper and she was doing she she had a kind of column where she'd do these these kind of um pithy interviews uh with with both famous people and Men industry in interviews and she was interviewing him and she asked them um what she thought what he believed his best quality was is his strongest virtue and she thought that he would say courage because he had been a war hero he had he was the only uh president who and this one he was Senator by the way who received the purple heart and you know he had a very kind of famous story of him as a hero in World War II and then he had come home and he'd written a book on car on moral courage among American politicians and one Pulitzer Prize that book profiles and courage and um which was a series of incidents where um American political leaders made decisions to to embrace principle even though their careers were at stake and in most cases were destroyed by their choice she thought he was going to say courage but he didn't he said curiosity and um I think you know looking back at his life that the best that that was true and that was the quality that allowed him to put himself in the shoes of his adversaries and he always said that if you if the only way that we're going to have peace is if we're able to put ourselves in the shoes or adversaries understand their behavior and their contact not context and that's why he was able to um you know during the uh he was able to resist the intelligence apparatus in the military during the Bay of Pigs when they said you've got to send in the Essex the aircraft carrier and he said no even though he'd only been in two months in office he was able to stand up to them because of because he was able to put himself in the shoes of both Castro and Khrushchev and understand there's got to be another solution to this and then during the Cuban Missile Crisis he was able to do it when the narrative was okay Khrushchev acted in a way as an aggressor to put missiles in our hemisphere how dare he do that and Jack and my father were able to say well wait a minute he's doing that because we put missiles in turkey and Italy that were right on you know the Turkish ones right on the Russian border and they then made a secret deal with dobrandon with ambassador to Brennan and you know with Khrushchev um to uh to remove the missiles in in Turkey if he moved the Jupiter missiles from Turkey if I'm so long as Khrushchev removed them from from Cuba every there were 13 men on the exact on the end what they call the ncon committee which was the group of people who were deciding you know what the action was what what they were going to do to end the Cuban muscle crisis and virtually and of those men 11 of them wanted to invade and wanted to bomb and invade and it was Jack and then later on my my father and and Bob McNamara who are the only people who were with him but because he was able to see the world from khrushchev's point of view of you he believed that there was another solution and then he also had the moral courage so um my father you know to get back to your question famously is that that moral courage is the most important quality and it's more it's more rare and courage on the football field or courage in battle than physical courage it's much more difficult to come by but it's the most important quality in a human being and you think that kind of empathy that you referred to that requires moral courage it certainly requires moral courage to to act on it you know and particularly you know in you know any time that a nation is at War there is kind of a momentum or an inertia that says okay let's not look at this from the other person's point of view and um that's the time we really need to do that well if you can apply that style of empathy style of curiosity to the current war in Ukraine what is your understanding of why Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022 Vladimir Putin could have avoided the war in the Ukraine well his invasion was illegal it was unnecessary and it was brutal um but I think it's important for us to move Beyond these kind of comic book depictions of a uh you know of this insane uh avaricious Russian leader who wants to you know restore the Soviet Empire and that that's why and it was I and who made an unfoged unprovoked um invasion of the Ukraine he was provoked and we were provoking them and we were provoking him for for since 1997. and it's not just me that's saying that I mean when when and before right before Putin never came in we were provoking Russia Russians in this way unnecessarily and to go back that time in 1992 when the Russians moved out when the Soviet Union was collapsing the Russians moved out of East Germany and they did that which was a huge concession and they had 400 000 troops in East Germany at that time and they were facing NATO troops on the other side of the wall a Gorbachev made this huge concession where he said to George Bush I'm going to move all of our troops out and you can then reunify Germany under NATO which was a hostile Army to the to the South it was created to you know uh with hostile intent with the Soviet Union and he said you can take Germany but I want your promise that you will not move NATO to the East and James Baker who was the Secretary of State famously said I will not move NATO we will not move Nato one inch to the east so then five years later in 1997 it's a big new Brzezinski who was kind of the father of the neocons who's a Democrat that time served in the in the uh Carter Administration he said he published a paper a blueprint for moving NATO right up to the Russian border a thousand miles to the east and and taking over 14 Nations and at that time George Cannon who was the kind of the deity of American diplomats he was probably arguably arguably the most important Diplomat in American history he was the architect of the containment policy during World War II and he said this is insane and it's unnecessary and if you do this it's going to provoke the Soviet uh I mean the Russians of violent response and we should be making friends with the Russians they lost the Cold War we should be treating them the way that we treated the our adversaries after World War II like with a Marshall plan to try to help them incorporate into Europe and to be part of the the Brotherhood of you know of man and of Western Nations we shouldn't continue to be treating him as an enemy and particularly surrounding them at their borders William Perry who was then the Secretary of State of uh defense under Bill Clinton threatened to resign he was so upset by this plan to move NATO to the ease and William Burns who is then the U.S ambassador of the Soviet Union who's now at this moment the head of the CIA said at the time the same thing if you do this it is going to provoke the Russians toward a military response and the we we moved it we moved all around Russia we moved to 14 Nations a thousand miles to the East and we put eight dismissal systems and two nations in Romania and Poland so we did what you know what the Russians had done to us in 1962 that ever vote would have provoked an invasion of Cuba we put those missile systems back there and then we walk away unilaterally walk away from the two uh nuclear missile treaties the intermediate nuclear missile treaties that we had with us with Russia and when neither of us would put on those missile systems on the borders we walk away from that and we put Aegis missile systems which are nuclear capable they can carry the Tomahawk missile switch of nuclear warheads so the last uh country that they didn't take was the Ukraine and the Russians said and in effect Bill Perry said this or William Byrne said it so now the head of the CIA it is a red line if we go into if we bring NATO into Ukraine that is a red line for the Russians they cannot live with it they cannot live with it Russia has been invaded three times through the Ukraine the last time it was invaded we killed or the Germans killed one out of every seven Russians they destroyed my uncle described what happened to Russia um in his famous American University speech in in uh in 1963 60 years ago this month or he's or last month 60 years ago in June June 10th 1963. he told that speech was telling American people put yourself in the choose the Russians we need to do that if we're gonna if we're gonna make peace and he said all of us have been taught you know that we won the war but we didn't win the war the Russians if anybody won the war against Hitler was the Russians their country was destroyed they they all of their cities and he said imagine if all of the Cities on the east coast of Chicago were reduced to rubble and all of the fields Burns all the force Burns that's what happened to Russia that's what they gave so that we could get rid of Adolf Hitler and he had them put themselves in their position and you know today there's none of that happening we have refused repeatedly to uh to talk to the Russians we've broken up there's two treaties the Minsk agreements which the Russians were willing to sign and they said we will stay out the Russians didn't want the Ukraine they showed that when they when the Don BOS region voted 90 to 10 to leave and go to Russia Putin said no we want Ukraine to stay intact but we want you to sign a Memphis Accords to to you know they the Russians were were very worried because of the U.S involvement in the coup in Ukraine in 2014. and then the oppression and the and the you know and the killing of 14 000 ethnic Russians and Russia hasn't had the same reason the same way that if Mexico would Aegis missile systems from China or Russia on our border and then killed 000 expats American we would go in there oh he does have a national security interest in the Ukraine he has an interest in protecting the russian-speaking people of the Ukraine yeah I think Russians and the Minsk accordions at it it left Ukraine as part of Russia and left him as a semi-autonomous region that could continue to use their own language which is essentially banned by the coup by the government we put in in 2014. um and uh and we wouldn't we we sabotaged that agreement and and we now know in April of 2022 zielinski and uh Putin had Inked a deal already to another peace agreement and that the United States sent Boris Johnson the neocons in the White House and Boris Johnson over to the Ukraine to sabotage that agreement so what do I think I think this is a proxy war I think this is a you know this is a war that the neoconsi and the White House wanted they've said for two decades they wanted this war and that they wanted to use Ukraine as a pawn in a proxy war between uh United States and Russia the same as we used Afghanistan and in fact they say it this is the model let's use the Afghanistan model that was set again and again and to to get the Russians to overextend their troops and then fight them using local uh Fighters and U.S weapons and when President Biden was asked why are we in the Ukraine he was honest he says to depose Vladimir Putin regime change for Vladimir Putin and when his defense secretary Lloyd Austin in April 2022 was asked you know why are we there he said to degrade the Russians capacity to fight anywhere to exhaust the Russian army and degrade its capacity to fight elsewhere in the world that's not a humanitarian Mission that's not what we were told we were we were told this was an unprovoked invasion but and that we're there to bring a humanitarian relief to the ukrainians but that is the opposite that is a war of attrition that is designed to chew up turn this little nation into an abattoir of death for the flower of Ukrainian youth in order to advance a geopolitical ambition of certain people within the White House and uh you know I think that's wrong we should be talking to the Russians the way that you know Nixon talked to prashnav the way that bush talked to Gorbachev the way that my uncle talked to Khrushchev we need to be talking with the Russians we should and and and negotiating and we need to be looking about how do we end this and preserve peace in Europe would you as president sit down and have a conversation with Vladimir Putin and Vladimir zolensky separately and together to negotiate peace absolutely what about Vladimir Putin he's been in power since 2000. so as the old adage goes power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely uh do you think he is been corrupted by being in power for so long if you think of the male if you look at his mind listen I don't know exactly um I can't say because I just I don't know enough about him or about you know like my the evidence that I've seen is that he is homicidal he kills his enemies or poisons them and you know the reaction I've seen to that to hit those accusations from him have not been to deny that but to kind of laugh it off I think he's a dangerous man and that of course you know um there's probably corruption in his regime but having said that it's not our business to change the Russian government and anybody who thinks it's a good idea to do regime change in Russia which has more nuclear weapons than we do um is I think irresponsible and you know Vladimir Putin himself has said you know we will not live in a world without Russia and it was clear when he said that that he was talking about himself and uh and he has his hand on a button that could bring you know Armageddon to the entire planet so why are we messing with this it's not our job to change that regime and and we should be making friends with the Russians we shouldn't be treating him as an enemy now we've pushed him into the camp with China that's not a good thing for our country and by the way you know what we're doing now does not appear to be weakening Putin at all Putin now you know if you believe the the polls that are coming out of Russia they show him you know the most recent polls that I've seen um show him with that 89 popularity that people in Russia support the war in Ukraine and that and they supported him as an individual so um and I understand there's problems with polling and you know you don't know what to believe but but the polls consistently show that and um and I you know it's not America's business to be the policeman of the world and to be changing regimes in the world that's illegal or not we shouldn't be breaking International laws you know we should actually be looking for ways to improve relationships with Russia not to you know not to destroy Russia not to destroy and not to choose its leadership for them that's up to the Russian people not us so step one is to sit down and empathize with the leaders of both Nations to understand their history their concerns their hopes just to open the door for conversation so they're not back to the corner and I think the U.S can play a really important role and a U.S president can play a really important role by reassuring the Russians that we're not going to consider them an enemy anymore that we want to be friends and it doesn't mean that you have to let down your guard completely the way that you do it which was the way President Kennedy did it is you do it one step at a time you take baby steps we do a unilateral move reduce or you know our our hostility and aggression and see if the Russians reciprocate and um and that's the way that we should be doing it and you know we should be easing our way into a positive relationship with Russia we have a lot in common with Russia and we should be friends with Russia and with the Russian people I mean you know apparently there's been 350 000 ukrainians who have died at least in this war and uh and there's probably been uh 60 or 80 000 Russians and that should not give us any Joy it should not give us any you know I saw Lindsey Graham on TV saying you know anything we can something to the extent that anything we can do to kill Russians is a good use of our money that it is not you know those are those are somebody's children they're you know we should have compassion for them this war is an unnecessary War we should settle it through negotiation through diplomacy through statecraft and not through weapons do you think this war can come to an end purely through military operations no I mean I don't think there's any way in the world that the ukrainians can beat the Russians I don't think there's any appetite in Europe I think Europe is now you know uh in having severe problems in Germany Italy France you're seeing these riots there's internal problems in those countries there is no appetite in um in uh in Europe for sending men to die in Ukraine and the ukrainians do not have anybody left the ukrainians are using press gangs too uh to you know to fill the ranks of their armies men military age men are trying as hard as they can to get out of the Ukraine right now to avoid going to the front the front you know the Russians apparently have been killing ukrainians in a seven to one ratio my son fought over there and he told me it's not you know artillery he had um he had fire fights with the Russians mainly at night but he said most of the battles were artillery wars during the day and that the Russians now out uh outgun the NATO forces ten to one in artillery oh they're killing at a horrendous rate now you know my interpretation of what's happened so far is that the Putin actually went in early on with a small Force because he expected to meet somebody on the other end of a negotiating table that once he went in and uh and that when that didn't happen they did not have a large enough Force to be able to mount an offensive and so they've been building up that Force up to now and they now have that force and even against this all original Force the ukrainians have been uh helpless all of their offenses have died they've now killed you know the head of the Ukrainian um Special Forces which was the probably arguably by many accounts the best uh Elite military unit in all of Europe the the commandant the commander of of the uh That Special Forces Group uh gave a speech about uh four months ago saying that 86 percent of his men are dead or wounded and will cannot return to the front he cannot rebuild that for us um the uh and you know the the the troops that are now headed that are now filling the gaps of all those 350 000 men who've been lost are are scantily trained and they're arriving green at the front any of them do not want to be there many of them are giving up and going over the Russian side we've seen this again and again again including platoon-sized groups that are defecting to the Russians and um I don't think it's possible to win and anybody you know I saw I I of course I've studied World War II history exhaustively I mean I saw a um there's a new I think it's a Netflix series of documentaries that I highly recommend to people there it's they're colorized versions of the black and white um films from the battles of World War II but it's all the battles of World War II so I watched Stalingrad the other night and uh you know the the willingness of the Russians to um to fight on against any kind of outs and to make huge sacrifices of the Russians themselves who were making the sacrifice with their lives the willingness of them to do that for their motherland is almost inexhaustible It is incomprehensible to think that the uh that Ukraine can can beat Russia in a war it would be like Mexico beating the United States it's just it's impossible to think that it can happen and you know Russia has deployed a tiny tiny fraction of its military so far and uh you know now it has China with its mass production capacity supporting its war effort it's just it's a it's a hopeless situation and we've been lied to you know we're the the press in our country and our government are just are just you know promoting this lie that the ukrainians are about to win and everything's going great and that Putin's on the run and there's all this wishful thinking because of the the Wagner group you know the uh the Goshen and the Wagner group that this was an internal coup and it showed dissent and weakness of Putin and none of that is true I was saying that that Insurgency which wasn't even an Insurgency he only got four thousand of his of his men to follow him out of twenty thousand and they were quickly stopped and nobody in the Russian military the oligarchy the political system nobody supported it you know and but we're being told oh yeah it's the beginning of the end for Putin he's weakened his wounded he's on his way out and all of these things are just lies that we are being fed so they push back on a small aspect of this he kind of implied so I've traveled to Ukraine and one thing that I should say similar to the Battle of Stalingrad it is just not is not only the Russians that fight to the end I think ukrainians are very yeah to fight to the end and the morale there is quite High I've talked to nobody this was a year ago in August with her son everybody was proud to fight and die for their country and there's some aspect where this war unified the people to get gave them a reason and an understanding that this is what it means to be Ukrainian and I will fight to the death I you know I would agree with that and I I should have said that myself at the beginning but you know that's the reason my son went over there to fight because the you know he was inspired by The Valor of the Ukrainian people and the you know this extraordinary willingness of them and I think Putin thought it would be much easier to sweep into Ukraine and he found you know a stone wall of ukrainians whether it read it but they're their lives and their bodies online but that to me makes the the whole episode even more tragic is that you know um I don't believe I I and I I think that the U.S role in this um has been uh has you know that there were there were many opportunities to settled this war and the ukrainians wanted a lot of marriage is a landscape when he ran in 2019. here's a guy who's a a comedian he's a he's an actor um he had no political experience and yet he won this election with 70 of the vote why he went on a peace platform anyone promising to sign the mystical courts and yet something happened when he got in there that made him suddenly pivot and you know I think it's a good guess what happened I think he was you know he came under Threat by Ultra natural and nationalists within his own Administration uh and the insistence of neocons like Victoria new and the White House that you know we don't want peace with Putin we want a war do you worry about nuclear war yeah I worry about it it's uh it seems like a silly question but it's not it's a serious question well the reason it's not you know the reason it it I might it's not is just because people seem to be in this kind of dream state about that it'll never happen and yet you know we're uh it can happen very easily and it can happen at any time and you know if we push the Russians too far you know I I don't doubt that Putin if he felt like his regime was in or his Nation was in danger that the United States was going to be able to place you know a quizling on you know in into the Kremlin um that he would use nuclear you know torpedoes um and uh you know these uh these strategic weapons that they have and that could be the man once you do that nobody controls the trajectory by the way you know I have I have very strong memories of the uh Cuban Missile Crisis and of those 13 days when we came closer to nuclear war you know and particularly I think it was when the U2 got shot down over uh Cuba uh you know and nobody in this guy there's a lot of people in Washington DC who at that point thought that they very male and may well may wake up dead that the world may end at night 30 million Americans killed 130 million Russians this is what our military brass wanted they saw a war with Russia nuclear exchange with Russia as not only inevitable but also desirable because they wanted to do it now oh we still had a superiority can you actually go through the feelings you've had about the Cuban Missile Crisis like what what are your memories of it what are some interesting no in the middle I was going to school in Washington DC to um or to um Our Lady of Victory which is in Washington DC so we were I lived in Virginia across Atomic and we would cross the bridge every day into DC and during the crisis uh U.S Marshals came to my house to take us I think around day eight my father was spending the night at the White House he wasn't coming home he was staying with the XCOM committee and sleeping there and they were up you know 24 hours they were debating and fake trying to figure out what was happening and um but we had U.S Marshals come to our house to take us down they were going to take us down to um a White Sulfur Springs and uh in Southern Virginia in the in the Blue Ridge Mountains where there was a um there was an underground city essentially a bunker that was like a city and apparently it had McDonald's in it and a lot of other you know it had it was a full City for the U.S government and their families U.S Marshals came to our house to take us down there and I was very excited about doing that and this was at a time you know when we were doing the drills we were doing the ducking cover drills um once a week at our school or they would tell you if they that you know when the alarms go off um then you you put your head onto the table you take the remove the Sharps from your desk put them inside your desk you put your head onto the table and you wait and the ignition blast will take the windows out of the school and then we all stand up and and file in an orderly fashion into the basement where we're going to be for the next six or eight months or whatever but in the basement where you know we we win occasionally in those corridors were lined with uh freeze-dried food canisters off to this here from Florida ceiling so people were you know we were all preparing for this and it was you know uh Bob McNamara who is my it was a friend of mine and you know it was my father one of my father's close friends as Secretary of Defense he later called Mass psychosis and my father deeply regretted participating in the bomb shelter program because he said it was part of a a you know a psychological psyop trick to treat them to teach Americans that nuclear war was acceptable that it was survivable my father anyway when they when the marshals came to our house to take me and my brother Joe away and we were the ones who are home at that time yeah um my father called and he talked to us on the phone and he said I don't want you going down there because um because if you disappear from school people are going to panic and I need you to be a good soldier and go to the school now and and he said something to me during that period which was that if the nuclear war happened it would be better to be among the dead than the living which I did not believe okay I mean I I had already prepared myself for the you know for the for the dystopian future and I knew I could I spent every day in the woods I knew that I could survive by catching crawfish and you know cooking Mud Puppies then we'll do whatever I had to do but I felt like okay I can I can handle this uh and I really wanted to see the setup down in you know this underground city but anyway that was you know part of it for um me my father was away and you know the last days of it my father um got this idea because Khrushchev had sent two letters he sent one letter that was conciliatory and then he sent a letter that after his Joint Chiefs and the warmongers around him saw that letter and they disapproved of it they sent another letter that was extremely belligerent and my father had the idea let's just pretend we didn't get the second letter and reply to the first one and then he went down to dobrennan and who was he met the Brennan in the justice department and the Brennan was the Soviet Ambassador and they you know they proposed this settlement which was a secret settlement Eric Khrushchev would withdraw the missiles from Cuba Khrushchev had put them into Cuba because we had put missiles you know nuclear missiles in in turkey and Italy and my uncle's secret deal was that if he if Khrushchev removed the missiles from Cuba within six months he would get rid of the Jupiter missiles in Turkey but if Khrushchev told anybody about the deal it was off so if if news got out about that secret deal it was off that was the actual deal and Khrushchev complied with it and then my uncle complied with it how much of that part of human history turned on the decisions of one person I think that's one of the you know because that of course the perennial question right but it is history kind of on uh an automatic pilot and you know uh human decisions the decisions of leaders really only have you know a marginal or incremental bearing on what is going to happen anyway but I think that is the and historians argue about that all the time I think that that is a really good example of a play a a place in human history that uh literally the world could have ended if we had a different leader in the White House and the reason for that is that there were as I recall 64 gun emplacements you know missile missile emplacements each one of those Muslim placements had a crew of about 100 men and they were Soviets so on they were and they we didn't know whether we had a couple of questions that my uncle asked Alan or ask the CIA and he asked Dulles was already gone but he asked the CIA and he asked um his military brass because they all wanted to go in everybody wanted to go ahead and my uncle said my uncle asked to see the aerial photos and he examined those personally and that's why it's important to have a leader in the White House who can push back on on their bureaucracies he um and then he asked them you know are those who's Manning those missile sites and are they Russians and if they're Russians and we bomb them uh are they isn't it going to force Khrushchev to then go into Berlin and that would be the beginning of a Cascade effect that would you know highly like the nuclear confrontation and the the uh the military perhaps said to my uncle oh we don't think you'll have uh you know we don't think he'll have the uh the guts to do that so he was my uncle was like that's what you're betting on and uh you know they all wanted him to go in they wanted him to bomb the sides and then invade Cuba and he said if we bomb those sites we're going to be killing Russians and it's going to force it's going to provoke Russia into some response and the obvious response is for them to go into Berlin oh the but the thing that we didn't know then that we didn't find out until I think uh you know there was a it was like a 30-year anniversary of the Cuban Missile Crisis in Havana and what we learned then was that from the Russians who came to that event it was like a symposium where everybody on both sides talked about it and we learned a lot of stuff and and never nobody knew before one of the insane things the most insane thing that we learned was that the the weapons were already the nuclear warheads were already in place they were ready to fire and that the authorization to fire was made was delegated to each of the gun gun crew commanders so there were 60 people who at all had authorization of fire if they felt themselves under attack so you have to believe that at least one of them would have launched and that would have been the beginning of the end and you know if they if anybody had launched you know we knew what would happen my uncle knew what would happen because he asked again and again what's going to happen and they said 30 million Americans will be killed but we will kill 130 million Russians so we will win and that was a victory for them and my uncle said later said he told he told Arthur Schlesinger and Kenny O'Donnell he said those guys he called them the salad brass the guys with all of this stuff on their chest and he said he said those guys they don't care because they know that if it happens that they're going to be in the charge of everything they're the ones who are going to be running the world after that so for them you know it was it was an incentive to to kill 130 million Russians and 30 million Americans but my uncle he had this correspondence with the Khrushchev they were secretly corresponding with each other and that is what saved the world is that they had that both of them had been Men of War Eisenhower famously said it will it will not be a man of war it will not be a soldier who starts world war three because the guy who's actually seen it knows how bad it is and my uncle you know had been In the Heat of the South Pacific he's already been cut into by a Japanese Destroyer um his many three of his crewmen have been killed one of them badly burned he he pulled that guy with a lanyard in his teeth six miles to an island in the middle of the night and then they hid out there for 10 days you know and um and you know he came back like I said he was the only uh president of the United States that are in the Purple Heart um meanwhile crew Chef had been a Stalingrad which was the worst place to be on the planet you know probably in the 20th century other than you know and Al Switzerland one of the death camps it was uh you know it was it was the most ferocious horrific war with people starving people you know committing cannibalism uh you know eating the dogs the cats eating their shoe leather we're easing to death by the thousands Etc a cruise ship did not the last thing he wanted was a war and the last thing my uncle wanted was a reward and they but the CIA did not know anything about Khrushchev and the reason for that is the city there was a mole at Langley so that every time the CIA got a spy in the Kremlin he would immediately be killed so if they had no eyes in the Kremlin you know there were literally hundreds of Russia of Russian supplies Who had who were who had affected the United States and were in the Kremlin who were killed during that period they had no idea anything about Khrushchev about how he saw the world and they saw the Kremlin itself as a monolith you know that it is uh is kind of you know the same way that we look at Putin today that you know it's all they have this ambition of world conquest and that's it's driving them and there's nothing else they think about they're absolutely single-minded about it but actually there was a big division between Khrushchev and uh and his Joint Chiefs and his intelligence apparatus and they and they both at one point discovered they were both in the same situation they were surrounded by spies and military personnel who were intent on going to war and they were the two guys resisting it so when my uncle my uncle had this idea of you know being the peace president from the beginning he told Ben Bradley his one of his best friends who you know was around the publisher of the Washington Post for the editor-in-chief at that time he said um Ben Bradley asked him what is what do you want in your gravestone and my uncle said he kept the peace he said the principal job of the president United States is to keep the country out of War and um and so when he first became president he he actually agreed to meet Khrushchev in Geneva to his Summit and by the way Eisenhower had wanted to do the same thing Eisenhower wanted peace but his and he was going to meet in Vienna but that peace Summit was blown up he was going to try to do um you know he was going to try to end the Cold War Eisenhower was in the last year of his of his in May of 1960. but that was torpedoed by the CIA during the U2 crash you know they sent you to over the over the Soviet Union and it got shot down and then they told and then Alan told us Eisenhower to deny that we hit a program they didn't know that the Russians had captured Gary Francis powers and so when and and that blew up the piece talks between Ei
Resume
Categories