Hukum Musik Dalam Islam [ID-EN Sub] - Ustadz Dr. Firanda Andirja, M.A.
r4nsnVK_aoc •
Transcript preview
Open
Kind: captions
Language: en
"What does Islamic law say
about music?"
Music is haram (unlawful).
It is unlawful
and the scholars have agreed.
All schools, Syafii, Maliki,
Hambali, Hanafi...
All say that it is unlawful.
I discussed it in my book.
"The teaching of Syafii school
that have been left out."
Among those who are firm about it
is Imam Syafii himself.
Imam Syafii said:
"Whosoever steals musical instrument
shall not have his hand(s) cut."
Because stealing musical instrument
is the same as stealing beer or pigs.
There is no obligation to cut the hands
of those who steal unlawful stuff.
.
If there is one who destroy musical instruments...
...said Imam Syafii, he does not need
to repay the loss.
Because it is the same as destroying alcohol.
It is unlawful.
And all scholars following Syafii school
forbid it.
Imam Ghazali and all imams
within Syafii school.
I am saying this because most Indonesian
follow Syafii school.
Even Ibnu Hajar Al Haitami
in his book...
Az-Zawajir'an Iqtirafi al-Kaba'ir
...said that playing and listening to music
are among big sins.
And he was a great scholar from Syafii school.
.
Some of the preachers in our country...
...say that we have to follow a school.
But when it comes to music,
there is no more school.
That’s what happens.
They ask, "What is your school?"
When it comes to music,
there is no more school.
This is lust.
You tell people to follow a school, but when it comes
to music, you leave the school.
You tell people to follow a school,
you have to be committed.
That when it comes to music
you follow your school.
Moreover, the four schools forbid it.
"Ustaz, there are different opinions."
It is true that some allow it.
For example, Ibnu Hisyam Al Andalusi
but it was rejected by the scholars.
There had been an agreement
before he said that it was allowed.
He said that it was allowed, saying that
a hadith from Bukhari was not authentic.
He was against the experts in Hadith
who said that it was authentic.
And he said that it was weak.
This is a mistake.
And we can’t argue with a false argument
of a scholar.
Resume
Read
file updated 2026-02-16 09:29:13 UTC
Categories
Manage